Only the Courts, Senate and National Archives CAN LEGALLY DECLARE an ELECTION WINNER Who is stupid enough to think the Associated Press or any Media can LEGALLY declare an Election Result?
What happens when the "WE LOVE RIOTS & BURNING CROWD" are misled to believe Biden has Won
But the COURTS LEGALLY DECLARE TRUMP HAS WON?
That's HOW YOU START A CIVIL WAR
Dominion Voting Software HACKED & CODED TO GIVE ELECTION TO BIDEN!!
White House BANNED by ABC, FOX, NBC from Presenting Election Fraud Evidence
10/9/2020 Kayleigh McEnany Briefs America on Election Fraud
Full Briefing
Why are 1000 FrontLine Doctors Being CENSORED?
DR. STELLA IMMANUEL, HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE
HEALS COVID patients
ROBERT F. KENNEDY EXPOSES VACCINE LIES!
50 Years of Fighting Big Pharma
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. begins his CRUSHING FACTS against vaccination at 27:07 and past 45:00 minutes in this video.
July 23, 2020 Vaccine debate between Robert Kennedy Jr. and Alan Dershowitz
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IfnJi7yLKgE
qha1 Highlights:
leftblue1 The CDC was Military auxillary specializing in bio-weapons, hence the title Surgeon General.
Fauci invested $500 million of Taxpayer Dollars into MODERNA while holding HALF THE STOCK HIMSELF!
Kennedy REFUTES Alan Dershowitz's common tropes: We owe vaccines for Small Pox eradication?! Nonsense! Many other SERIOUS DISEASES also dissappeared at the same time but WITHOUT ANY VACCINE at all. Robert F. Kennedy explains why.
SOME VACCINES ARE TESTED ONLY 5 DAYS. And MOST without a placebo test group.
Vaccines for Covid are skipping the animal phase of testing entirely.
One Covid vaccine has a 20% injury rate! AND YET THEY MADE 2 BILLION DOSES ANYWAY.
Vaccines typically injure 1 in 40 participants. Do not believe the 1 in 1 million lies.
qha4 Sources, references, journals and citations are in the video!
-z
A Century Of Vaccination And What It Teaches by Trung Nguyen
Liberal Demos Control Antifa-BLM Mercenaries who are ABOVE THE LAW
If one sums Demo mobs, Demo Plandemics, myriad slick Election Fraud patterns and knowing ALL NEWS OUTLETS are extensions of the DNC, how can FAIR ELECTIONS in America ever be POSSIBLE AGAIN?
The Black Death killed between a third and a half of the population of Europe and the Near East.
This huge number of deaths was accompanied by general economic devastation. With a third of the workforce dead, the crops could not be harvested and communities fell apart. One in ten villages in England (and in Tuscany and other regions) were lost and never re-founded. Houses fell into the ground and were covered by grass and earth, leaving only the church behind. If you ever see a church or chapel all alone in a field, you are probably looking at the last remains of one of Europe’s lost villages.
The traumatic experience of the Black Death, which killed perhaps 80% of those who caught it,
This sickness befell people everywhere, but especially the middling and lower classes, rarely the great. It generated such horror that children did not dare to visit their dying parents, nor parents their children, but fled for fear of contagion as if from leprosy or a serpent.
These lines could almost have been written today.
Small business has taken a really decisive hit across a wide range of sectors as Covid-19, like the Black Death, results in big companies gaining market share. Even those working at home to write pieces like this are working on Skype (owned by Microsoft), Zoom and BlueJeans, as well using email clients and laptops made by a small number of global organisations. Billionaires are getting richer while ordinary people lose their jobs. Jeff Bezos, Amazon’s CEO, has increased his wealth by US$25 billion since the start of the year.
But this is not the whole story. The other big trend in the response to the virus has been the strengthening of the power of the state.
Governing pandemics
At a state level, the Black Death caused the acceleration of trends towards centralisation, the growth of taxation, and government dependence upon large companies.
Planned CHAOS
The present CHAOS, ALL OF IT, is a STRATEGY to thwart the silent CHRISTIAN MAJORITY's desire to reelect President Trump
The Plan
Five SUPER POWER GROUPS have realized they can join forces to easily RULE THE WORLD and destroy any country, business or political party they please.
1. Desperate Liberals and Elites helplessly watched America choose a President who would defend Free Speech, Freedom of Religion and Freedom to Arm against Tyrants and murderous arsonist anarchist mobs.
2. Disease Centers sling the word Science and Data to baselessly declare THE GREAT LIE through which they can grab all money, power, all personal medical and private data. They can now also imprison ANYONE THEY CHOOSE.
How does the CHAMISHA (e.g. chamisha is five in Hebrew, like a five headed beast or POLITICAL ANTICHRIST CHIMERA) convince ALL MANKIND to surrender ALL POWER? How did the Chamisha take the first few steps to becoming the RULER OF THE EARTH? The way it was foretold: A GREAT LIE THAT DECEIVES THE MORALLY WAYWARD.
a.) MANKIND is in GREAT DANGER! A new virus is here. It is infecting and killing us on a MASSIVE GLOBAL SCALE. The rapidity of contagion and death potential of this new virus poses a threat to all mankind GREATLY EXCEEDING anything earth has experienced before.
b.) We must insist you refrain from in person religious and political meetings, especially religious singing and exuberant rallies. We must insist you remain in your homes until we say otherwise. We elites do not enjoy wielding power over you. It's for your own good that the men with guns keep you in line. After all, what is the loss of global freedom, all social gathering benefits and destruction of businesses and economies if even one life is saved? A life is priceless. To we, your Liberal Elite Masters and Wardens. And don't worry if you cannot earn enough money to feed your family. Simply get in line for our handouts. We do not enjoy making you dependent upon us. The New Socialist Marxist Overlord Order we are creating is for your own protection.
c.) We are emptying America's treasures. We need these trillions to fight the disease, sustain corporations of our choosing and to assist in closing down America. We must simultaneously stop all economic income at the same time we are emptying America of all savings. We do not relish plunging America toward an irrecoverable deficit and removing the country we hate as the world economic power.
And we doubly regret this happening so close to an election. We admit we cannot hide our extreme IRRATIONALL HATRED of Donald Trump. Especially when he held up that large Bible as he stood before the church we had just burned down to make clear church meetings are now forbidden. But you would be wrong to conclude all this chaos just before his chance to be reelected is our strategic instigation. It's not as though we have had bio-chemical viral warfare technology for half a century now.
Okay, we cannot hide that we have the capability to create new viruses that can even selectively infect. But we would never use this against our own people. The only reason we spend trillions on biological warfare and weaponized virus labs is FOR USE ON OTHER COUNTRIES. Not you guys. Remember, there is no such thing as Satan. Men are not capable of great and coordinated lies. You can trust us. Our weaponized highly customizable viruses have not just been used to subvert a fair election.
Have you noticed ALL FREEDOMS HAVE BEEN STRIPPED FROM AMERICA overnight? No free speech, no freedom of religion, no right to assemble for Christians, only thousand strong liberal arsonist rioters free to burn down churches have immunity to Covid and the media's FULL SUPPORT. Their criminality is called "the summer of love," a lie so beautiful Satan himself smiled. How did America become the land of the imprisoned, ENSLAVED and looted OVERNIGHT? Is it because Covid is deadlier than anything in our past? Hospitals, Doctors, alchohol, antidepressants and other prescription drugs KILL MORE PEOPLE BY FAR. Except they are profitable. But not as profitable as the Covid vaccine will be. It will be the MOST PROFITABLE PRODUCT in recent American History.
People in politics, big pharmaceutical and military scientists developing ever more effective ways of killing en masse are, as a general rule, pretty nice people. They are immune to the appeal of money and corrupting influence of GREAT POWER. The aforementioned cartels would never attempt to deceive you. The rich and powerful would never wish to hold absolute political power over you. I mean sure, they are all in weaponized politics designed to exert power over rivals, but if you gouge out your eyes and brain you can almost forget this.
Vaccination Pharmaceuticals spend $20B wining and dining doctors. They spend $6B on TV ads and commercials. Pfizer spent $213 million just on TV ads for Lyrica, a single drug. They spent another $209 million on Xeljanz ads. AbbVie spent $375 million on TV ads for Humira. Did you notice all the ADD and autistic children appeared just as they begin pumping us with 72 vaccines by age 10? Can we trust Vaccination companies pumping billions into political campaign funds?
Are you okay with the Liberal plan of FORCED VACCINATIONS and Contact Tracing? Are you fine with liberal mobs burning churches and businesses and destroying global economies by planned "pandemics?" Would you like America to become a POLICE STATE where freedom of speech and religion vanish? Then vote for the Socialist-Marxist Democratic Party and their senile basement-dweller.
If you want to be FREE and prosperous and FIGHT the power of antiChrist vote for the BRAVE MAN who held up THE BIBLE standing before the SMOLDERING CHURCH BURNED BY THE ENEMIES of Light.
Vaccines Kill - For Money
Plague of Corruption: The History of Deadly Vaccines for Profit by Dr. Judy Mikovits
Plague of Corruption: The History of Deadly Vaccines for Profit by Dr. Judy Mikovits
qha2 Contents
Foreword by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. ix
Introduction xxi
1. A Scientist at Sea 1
2. A Rebel from the Start 19
3. The Dead Doctors—What Is Real? 31
4. The Fate of Those Who Fight the Darkness 49
5. Is the Government a Friend or Foe? 67
6. The Blood Working Group and the Cerus Boondoggle 77
7. VP62—The Clone Assassin 97
8. My Identity Stolen in Vaccine Court 111
9. What I Really Think about HIV and Ebola 141
10. My Coauthor Gets Banned from Australia 163
11. The Way Forward 179
12. One More Story I Should Probably Tell 203
How Powerful is Big Pharma ? How Much Hush Money is Changing Hands?
Which global companies spent the Most on TV ads? All Big Pharma Conglomerates. You know, the ones also giving the most BILLIONS to politicians, legislators and schmoozing judges and lawyers so THEY CANNOT BE SUED if they kill your children say, with a Gardisil, MMR or Covid-19 "vaccine."
Pharmaceutical Company AbbVie spent $375 Million JUST ON TV ADS. And the top Pharma's spend an additional $20B wining and dining doctors.
Look at the amounts below from 2018 just for TV marketing of deadly drugs.
Sure, many people die during clinical trials. But if you are making this kind of money, apparently, everyone turns a blind eye.
Never mind that 1 in 4 kids has a learning disability, health crisis, autism or other life stulting condition.
Have you noticed the unhealthy population began just as the CDC began recommending 72 vaccines per child by age 12?
How much $$ MONEY does Big Pharma Have?! Enough to BUY our government's BLIND EYES to the DEATH they cause?
1. AbbVie’s Humira: $375 million
2. Pfizer’s Lyrica: $213 million
3. Pfizer’s Xeljanz: $209 million
4. Eli Lilly’s Trulicity: $183 million
5. Bayer and Johnson & Johnson's Xarelto: $143 million
6. Celgene’s Otezla: $139 million
7. Pfizer and Bristol-Myers Squibb's Eliquis: $136 million
8. Merck’s Keytruda: $107 million
9. Pfizer’s Ibrance: $92 million
10. Boehringer Ingelheim and Eli Lilly's Jardiance: $86 million
11. Otsuka and Lundbeck's Rexulti: $84 million
12. Eli Lilly’s Taltz: $83 million
13. Eli Lilly’s Verzenio: $80.4 million
14. Pfizer’s Prevnar 13: $79.9 million
15. Pfizer’s Eucrisa: $79.7 million
16. Sunovion’s Latuda: $78 million
17. Novo Nordisk’s Victoza: $78 million
18. AstraZeneca’s Farxiga: $75 million
19. Amgen’s Enbrel: $70 million
20. Novartis’ Cosentyx: $64 million
Since the breakout of COVID-19, a number of scientists have spoken out saying the virus does not appear to have evolved naturally and those suspicions are only getting stronger.
As reported1 by Newsweek April 28, 2020, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) has in recent years funded dangerous gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses at the biosafety level 4 (BSL4) laboratory in Wuhan, China.
“In 2019, with the backing of NIAID, the National Institutes of Health committed $3.7 million over six years for research that included some gain-of-function work. The program followed another $3.7 million, 5-year project for collecting and studying bat coronaviruses, which ended in 2019, bringing the total to $7.4 million.
Many scientists have criticized gain of function research, which involves manipulating viruses in the lab to explore their potential for infecting humans, because it creates a risk of starting a pandemic from accidental release.”
As noted by GM Watch,3 “Bolstering the lab escape hypothesis in the eyes of the media is the news that the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) has updated its assessment of the origin of the COVID-19 virus SARS-CoV-2 to reflect that it may have been accidentally released from a lab in Wuhan due to ‘unsafe laboratory practices.’"
Unfortunately, mainstream media journalists are by and large ignoring the long history of accidental releases of dangerous pathogens from BSL3 and 4 laboratories. Journalist Sam Husseini discusses this history in a May 5, 2020 article in Independent Science News.4
Mainstream media journalists clearly are also not asking enough questions, or the right questions, about the origins of SARS-CoV-2. In his May 4, 2020, video update (above), Chris Martenson,5 who has a Ph.D. in pathology, carefully details the science behind his assertion that SARS-CoV-2 must have undergone laboratory manipulation. The evidence he lays out is close to conclusive, and really would be front-page news if unbiased journalism still existed.
What Is Gain of Function?
As explained by Martenson, gain of function research refers to research in which the pathogenicity or transmissibility of pathogens is enhanced. In other words, pathogens are manipulated in various ways to make them deadlier, and/or allow them to infect humans with greater ease. They also take viruses that are harmless to humans and conduct experiments to make them transmissible to humans.
Scientists are Above Lying. Unlike Other Professions, You Can trust them. Except that..
Half of all Scientific Retractions involved fabrication, falsification ...government's definition of scientific misconduct. Behaviors widely understood within science to be dishonest and unethical include forged authorship, fake peer reviews, and failure to obtain approval for research on human subjects or animals.
About half of all retractions appear to have involved fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism—behaviors that fall within the U.S. government's definition of scientific misconduct. Behaviors widely understood within science to be dishonest and unethical, but which fall outside the U.S. misconduct definition, seem to account for another 10%. Those behaviors include forged authorship, fake peer reviews, and failure to obtain approval from institutional review boards for research on human subjects or animals.
Nearly a decade ago, headlines highlighted a disturbing trend in science: The number of articles retracted by journals had increased 10-fold during the previous 10 years. Fraud accounted for some 60% of those retractions; one offender, anesthesiologist Joachim Boldt, had racked up almost 90 retractions after investigators concluded he had fabricated data and committed other ethical violations. Boldt may have even harmed patients by encouraging the adoption of an unproven surgical treatment. Science, it seemed, faced a mushrooming crisis.
..make greater efforts to stamp out bad science. The attention also helped catalyze an effort by two longtime health journalists—Ivan Oransky and Adam Marcus, who founded the blog Retraction Watch, based in New York City—to get more insight into just how many scientific papers were being withdrawn, and why. They began to assemble a list of retractions.
That list, formally released to the public this week as a searchable database, is now the largest and most comprehensive of its kind. It includes more than 18,000 retracted papers and conference abstracts dating back to the 1970s (and even one paper from 1756 involving Benjamin Franklin). It is not a perfect window into the world of retractions. Not all publishers, for instance, publicize or clearly label papers they have retracted, or explain why they did so. And determining which author is responsible for a paper's fatal flaws can be difficult.
..an epidemic of fraud as a community
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Gardasil Science Day Presentation Video—
“Many of the things I’m going to say today would be slanderous if they were not true. And if they’re not true, then Merck should sue me. But Merck won’t do that. And they won’t do it because in the United States, truth is an absolute defense against slander.”
…Gardasil Vaccine’s safety record has been nothing short of disastrous.
Among vaccinologists, it’s axiomatic that the duration of immunity correlates directly to the toxicity of the adjuvant; the more toxic the adjuvant, the longer the duration of immunity.
Gardasil’s super-powered aluminum adjuvant
Plaintiffs began the day with a 2.5 hour presentation with lawyers running through a riveting 50-minute slide show demonstrating how Gardasil’s super-powered Amorphous Aluminum Hydroxyphosphate Sulfate (AAHS) adjuvant over-stimulated the immune systems of vaccine recipients tipping them into autoimmune conditions in which their redlining immune defenses begin attacking their bodies’ own organs. This “autoimmune process” causes a cascade of illnesses that, in Jennifer Robi’s case, resulted in damage and deterioration in diverse organ systems throughout her body.
Victims like Jennifer are left exhausted as the body fights off disease on multiple fronts. Attorney Pennock explained that vaccine makers add aluminum adjuvants (to weak antigens and a long list of other potentially toxic ingredients) to elicit an immune response, hoping to extend the short-term immunity otherwise provided by most vaccines. Among vaccinologists, it’s axiomatic that the duration of immunity correlates directly to the toxicity of the adjuvant; the more toxic the adjuvant, the longer the duration of immunity.
Most vaccines provide immunity for only 5-10 years. Gardasil’s promoters were promising lifelong protection, and Qblue needed a super toxic adjuvant -z that would provide this unprecedented level of protection. Qblue After all, Merck was promising regulators, pediatricians and the public that inoculations given to 9-12-year-old girls would provide immunity against a relatively rare cancer that typically doesn’t kill until age 58! -z
Pennock explained that Merck has refused to disclose the contents of AAHS or to provide samples to independent and university scientists for testing. AAHS, astonishingly, has never been safety tested by government regulators or by Merck.
Studies on animals conducted by world renowned independent scientists like Dr. Chris Exley, Dr. Yehuda Shoenfeld, Dr. Chris Shaw and others have found that mice and sheep exposed to aluminum adjuvants, at concentrations comparable to those found in vaccines, develop strange behavioral patterns and illnesses resembling autoimmune diseases.
Using a poisonous placebo in the control group allowed Merck to mask the cascade of injuries suffered by girls in the Gardasil group during the clinical trials.
A parade of deceptive canards
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. next gave the court an explosive 50-minute presentation of 112 disturbing slides describing the parade of deceptive canards that composed Merck’s clinical trials. Kennedy described a series of fraudulent gimmicks employed by Merck to deceive regulators during the clinical trials including the use of a “spiked” extremely toxic AAHS placebo rather than a true inert placebo that is standard for control groups in blue ribbon safety studies for other pharmaceutical products. Using a poisonous placebo in the control group allowed Merck to mask the cascade of injuries suffered by girls in the Gardasil group during the clinical trials. Half the girls in the Gardasil group and half the girls in the spiked placebo group suffered serious injuries, including several deaths, in the first seven months of the clinical trials, yet Merck was able to claim that reactions in the study group “were similar to the reactions in the placebo group,” and that, therefore, the vaccine was safe. Merck reported most of these serious injuries as “new medical conditions” not adverse events, dismissing any connection to the vaccine by fiat. Information about this parade of grave injuries appears nowhere in the Gardasil package insert.
Merck committed its boldest fraud in its key clinical trial, Protocol 18. Merck told FDA that Protocol 18 was the single study in which its researchers gave the control group a true inert placebo. For this reason, FDA declared Protocol 18 “of special interest.” However, in reality, Merck appears to have taken the precaution of removing half the aluminum from the vaccines administered to this study group. Plus, The Company laced the “placebo” with a witches’ brew of other toxic chemicals. This study, the only “controlled” study that included children in the target cohort of 9-12-year olds, may not have in fact tested the vaccine that Merck went on to inject into millions of young children around the world. Kennedy told the judge that this is not just scientific malpractice, it is outright fraud!
… Merck’s control groups did not reflect the target population for its drug.
Another tactic utilized by Merck was to purge the study group of anyone with the slightest vulnerabilities to the vaccine or its ingredients despite the fact that the vaccine would ultimately be marketed to girls with the very vulnerabilities excluded during the clinical trials. This precaution allowed the company to mask effects that occur only in vulnerable subgroups.
Mr. Kennedy drew laughter from the large court room audience when he described how Merck had prescreened the study subjects to exclude people with allergies, immunological or nervous disorders, more than 4 lifetime sexual partners, genetic vulnerabilities to cancer or to any other medical condition, or with any hint of general infection, a history of alcohol or drug abuse, or a serious or chronic illnesses, and so forth. Finally, Merck told its researchers to exclude any individual with “any condition which in the opinion of the researchers might interfere with the study objective.” The remaining participants were an elite club of super healthy individuals. “You couldn’t get into the clinical trials unless you were a superhero,” Kennedy told Judge Nelson. “You had to be eligible for the Avengers.”
The problem, of course, is that none of the people receiving the vaccine under CDC’s mandate are anything like this or screened for these vulnerabilities. In other words, Merck’s control groups did not reflect the target population for its drug.
The mayhem caused by Gardasil
Even these flimflams could not conceal the mayhem caused by Gardasil. Kennedy showed the court data from Merck’s own package insert showing that 2.3 % of the girls receiving the vaccine complained of symptoms of autoimmune disease within 7 months. Since cervical cancer kills only 1.5 Americans in every 100,000, he noted, “Merck’s own data show that the chances of getting an autoimmune disease from this vaccine are 1000 times the risk of dying from cervical cancer.”
Merck’s own data showed that administering the Gardasil vaccine to girls who had previous exposure to HPV actually raised their risk of developing precancerous lesions (or worse) by almost 45%.
Not only did a heartbreaking 50% of the subjects in both the study group and the spiked placebo group experience a serious adverse event within the seven months of the trial, death rates among girls in the study were double background rates. In fact, the rate for girls during the clinical trials (85/100,000) was 37 times the death rate from cervical cancer! Birth defects among children conceived during the study period were 5x those of the control group and miscarriages were doubled over background rates. Reproductive problems among vaccinated girls were 10x background rates. Finally, Merck’s own data showed that administering the Gardasil vaccine to girls who had previous exposure to HPV actually raised their risk of developing precancerous lesions (or worse) by almost 45%. This revelation is particularly frightening since sexual behavior is only one of many vectors for acquiring HPV. Many children are exposed in the birth canal. Kennedy cited numerous studies showing many very young children are exposed to HPV, including one in which upwards of 34% of girls had exposure to HPV prior to age 10.
Kennedy closed his powerful presentation by chronicling the parade of corrupt conflicts that caused HHS officials to turn a blind eye to the rife fraud that characterized the clinical trials. Merck loaded the two FDA and CDC panels that approved Gardasil, with paid toadies. He showed that the pharmaceutical industry actually pays 45% of FDA’s annual budget and that NIH and its officials own part of the patents to the Gardasil vaccine and collect royalties on every vaccine sold. NIH collects tens of millions of dollars annually from Gardasil sales. Finally, 45% of CDC’s budget goes to promoting and purchasing vaccines. Merck exerts control over the CDC with millions of dollars in contributions to the CDC foundation, which allows funding for pet projects. This level of support gives Merck the power to also punish the CDC by withholding funding if displeased by the agency.
It's Unclear Why Washington State Wishes to Force HPV Vaccine/Gardasil onto Grade School Children Despite the Death Toll
Dear WA Board of Health:As a Washington State Resident, I strongly oppose the proposed rule change to add the HPV vaccine to Chapter 246-105 WAC Immunization of Child Care and School Children Against Certain Vaccine Preventable Diseases.
The risks are of the HPV Vaccine/Gardasil are far greater than the benefits. This proposed rule change should not be recommended for many reasons including but not limited to thefollowing:
1. HPV is a sexually transmitted infection that is not caught in public settings such as daycare or school. HPV infections are very common, mostly symptom-free, and naturally clear on their own 95% of the time.
2. You have a higher chance of dying from the HPV vaccine product/Gardasil than getting or dying from a HPV associated cancer. The death rate of cervical cancer in the US is2.3/100,000. The death rate in the Gardasil clinical trials was 85/100,000 or 37 times that of cervical cancer. The total HPV associated cancer rate of cervical, anal, vaginal and vulvar is19.8/100,000.
3. According to the Gardasil insert there is a 2.3% chance of developing an autoimmune disease after receiving the HPV vaccine product/Gardasil. That means 2.3 out of every 100 children will develop a lifelong chronic disease such as arthritis, lupus, multiple sclerosis, etc.after receiving the liability free HPV vaccine product/Gardasil 4. Half (49.6%) of the clinical trial subjects who received Gardasil reported serious medical conditions within seven months. To avoid classifying these injuries as adverse events, Merck dismissed them as “new medical conditions.”
5. Females in the Gardasil clinical trials with evidence of current HPV infection and previous exposure to HPV had a 44% increased risk of developing cervical lesions or cancer following vaccination.
6. The HPV vaccine product/Gardasil has been associated with premature ovarian failure(teenage menopause!) and increased miscarriage rates 10-15% higher than the corresponding reproductive age group.
7. There have not been any real Gardasil safety studies conducted. In the Gardasil clinical trials, Merck used a neurotoxic aluminum adjuvant called AAHS instead of using an inert saline placebo. In the clinical trials, there was little to no difference in the safety profiles of theAAHS adjuvant and Gardasil. The World Health Organization has stated that using something other than an inert substance as a placebo creates a “methodological disadvantage”. This may make it “difficult or impossible” to assess vaccine safety properly without a true placebo. It is no surprise to learn that Merck is currently being sued for fraudulent Gardasil safety studies.
8. Japan removed the HPV vaccine product/Gardasil from their recommended list of childhood vaccines after an enormous amount of adverse events occurred after Gardasil was administered.
9. Informed choice and medical freedom are fundamental rights. As citizens and parents we have the right to decide what is injected into our bodies and our children’s and a right to know the risks and benefits associated with each liability free pharmaceutical vaccine product.
10. According to the American Cancer Society, cervical cancer is preventable with proper screening tests.
I strongly urge you to get all the facts about the HPV vaccine product/Gardasil.
I encourage you to read The HPV Vaccine on Trial and learn about the current case where Merck is being sued for fraudulent Gardasil safety studies.
I urge you to be one of the public health officials/politicians who is willing to put the health of our children first, ahead of political agendas and pharmaceutical profits. How many more of our children have to be diagnosed with lifelong chronic autoimmune diseases or die?
Sincerely,
Rebeka Gentian
half of all retractions...involved fabrication, falsification..government's definition of scientific misconduct. Behaviors widely understood within science to be dishonest and unethical...include forged authorship, fake peer reviews, and failure to obtain approval...for research on human subjects or animals.
About half of all retractions appear to have involved fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism—behaviors that fall within the U.S. government's definition of scientific misconduct. Behaviors widely understood within science to be dishonest and unethical, but which fall outside the U.S. misconduct definition, seem to account for another 10%. Those behaviors include forged authorship, fake peer reviews, and failure to obtain approval from institutional review boards for research on human subjects or animals.
Nearly a decade ago, headlines highlighted a disturbing trend in science: The number of articles retracted by journals had increased 10-fold during the previous 10 years. Fraud accounted for some 60% of those retractions; one offender, anesthesiologist Joachim Boldt, had racked up almost 90 retractions after investigators concluded he had fabricated data and committed other ethical violations. Boldt may have even harmed patients by encouraging the adoption of an unproven surgical treatment. Science, it seemed, faced a mushrooming crisis.
..make greater efforts to stamp out bad science. The attention also helped catalyze an effort by two longtime health journalists—Ivan Oransky and Adam Marcus, who founded the blog Retraction Watch, based in New York City—to get more insight into just how many scientific papers were being withdrawn, and why. They began to assemble a list of retractions.
That list, formally released to the public this week as a searchable database, is now the largest and most comprehensive of its kind. It includes more than 18,000 retracted papers and conference abstracts dating back to the 1970s (and even one paper from 1756 involving Benjamin Franklin). It is not a perfect window into the world of retractions. Not all publishers, for instance, publicize or clearly label papers they have retracted, or explain why they did so. And determining which author is responsible for a paper's fatal flaws can be difficult.
..an epidemic of fraud as a community
“An epidemiological investigation of 2019 novel coronavirus diseases through aerosol－borne transmission by public transport,” published in early March in Practical Preventive Medicine and retracted sometime in mid-April. More context here.
“Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial,” published in International Journal of Microbial Agents on March 20, 2020. More context here and here.
When a third of Europe’s population was lost, wealth concentrated into tiny groups. Is Covid-19 a similar wealth & power trigger?
